Higgs boson

Higgs boson
CMS Higgs-event.jpg
A simulated event, featuring the appearance of the Higgs boson
Composition: Elementary particle
Particle statistics: Bosonic
Status: Hypothetical
Theorized: F. Englert, R. Brout, P. Higgs, G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble 1964
Mass: between 115 and 185 GeV/c2 (predicted)
Spin: 0

The Higgs boson is a hypothetical massive scalar elementary particle predicted to exist by the Standard Model of particle physics. At present there are no known elementary scalar bosons (spin-0 particles) in nature, although many composite spin-0 particles are known. The existence of the particle is postulated as a means of resolving inconsistencies in current theoretical physics, and attempts are being made to confirm the existence of the particle by experimentation, using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN and the Tevatron at Fermilab. Other theories exist that do not anticipate the Higgs boson, described elsewhere as the Higgsless model.

The Higgs boson is the only Standard Model particle that has not been observed and is thought to be the mediator of mass. Experimental detection of the Higgs boson would help explain the origin of mass in the universe. The Higgs boson would explain the difference between the massless photon, which mediates electromagnetism, and the massive W and Z bosons, which mediate the weak force. If the Higgs boson exists, it is an integral and pervasive component of the material world.

Arguments based on the Standard Model suggest the mass of the Higgs is below 1.4 TeV. Therefore the Large Hadron Collider[1] is expected to provide experimental evidence of the existence or non-existence of the Higgs boson. Experiments at Fermilab also continue previous attempts at detection, albeit hindered by the lower energy of the Tevatron accelerator, although it theoretically has the necessary energy to produce the Higgs boson. It has been reported that Fermilab physicists suggest that the odds of the Tevatron detecting the Higgs boson, if indeed it exists, are between 50% and 96%, depending on its mass.[2]

Contents

Origin of the theory

2010 APS J.J. Sakurai Prize Winners

The Higgs mechanism (or "Englert-Brout-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble" [3]) which gives mass to vector bosons, was theorized in 1964 by François Englert and Robert Brout ("boson scalaire");[4] in October of the same year by Peter Higgs,[5] working from the ideas of Philip Anderson; and independently by Gerald Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and Tom Kibble,[6] who worked out the results by the spring of 1963.[7] The three papers written on this discovery by Guralnik, Hagen, Kibble, Higgs, Brout, and Englert were each recognized as milestone papers during Physical Review Letters 50th anniversary celebration.[8] While each of these famous papers took similar approaches, the contributions and differences between the 1964 PRL Symmetry Breaking papers is noteworthy. These six physicists were also awarded the 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics for this work.[9] Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam were the first to apply the Higgs mechanism to the electroweak symmetry breaking. The electroweak theory predicts a neutral particle whose mass is not far from that of the W and Z bosons.

Theoretical overview

A one-loop Feynman diagram of the first-order correction to the Higgs mass. The Higgs boson couples strongly to the top quark so it may decay into top anti-top quark pairs.

The Higgs boson particle is one quantum component of the theoretical Higgs field. In empty space, the Higgs field has an amplitude different from zero; i.e., a non-zero vacuum expectation value. The existence of this non-zero vacuum expectation plays a fundamental role: it gives mass to every elementary particle that couples to the Higgs field, including the Higgs boson itself. In particular, the acquisition of a non-zero vacuum expectation value spontaneously breaks electroweak gauge symmetry, which scientists often refer to as the Higgs mechanism. This is the simplest mechanism capable of giving mass to the gauge bosons while remaining compatible with gauge theories. In essence, this field is analogous to a pool of molasses that "sticks" to the otherwise massless fundamental particles that travel through the field, converting them into particles with mass that form, for example, the components of atoms. Prof. David J. Miller of University College London provided a simple explanation of the Higgs Boson, for which he won an award.[10]

In the Standard Model, the Higgs field consists of two neutral and two charged component fields. Both of the charged components and one of the neutral fields are Goldstone bosons, which act as the longitudinal third-polarization components of the massive W+, W, and Z bosons. The quantum of the remaining neutral component corresponds to the massive Higgs boson. Since the Higgs field is a scalar field, the Higgs boson has no spin, hence no intrinsic angular momentum. The Higgs boson is also its own antiparticle and is CP-even.

The Standard Model does not predict the mass of the Higgs boson. If that mass is between 115 and 180 GeV/c2, then the Standard Model can be valid at energy scales all the way up to the Planck scale (1016 TeV). Many theorists expect new physics beyond the Standard Model to emerge at the TeV-scale, based on unsatisfactory properties of the Standard Model. The highest possible mass scale allowed for the Higgs boson (or some other electroweak symmetry breaking mechanism) is 1.4 TeV; beyond this point, the Standard Model becomes inconsistent without such a mechanism, because unitarity is violated in certain scattering processes. Many models of supersymmetry predict that the lightest Higgs boson (of several) will have a mass only slightly above the current experimental limits, at around 120 GeV or less.

Supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model (so called SUSY) predict the existence of whole families of Higgs bosons, as opposed to a single Higgs particle of the Standard Model. Among the SUSY models, in the Minimal Supersymmetric extension (MSSM) the Higgs mechanism yields the smallest number of Higgs bosons: there are two Higgs doublets, leading to the existence of a quintet of scalar particles: two CP-even neutral Higgs bosons h and H, a CP-odd neutral Higgs boson A, and two charged Higgs particles H±.

There are over a hundred theoretical Higgs-mass predictions.[11]

Experimental search

Status as of August 2010, to 95% confidence interval
A Feynman diagram of one way the Higgs boson may be produced at the LHC. Here, two gluons decay into a top/anti-top pair, which then combine to make a neutral Higgs.
A Feynman diagram of another way the Higgs boson may be produced at the LHC. Here, two quarks each emit a W or Z boson, which combine to make a neutral Higgs.

As of July 2010, the Higgs boson has yet to be confirmed experimentally[12], despite large efforts invested in accelerator experiments at CERN and Fermilab. The data gathered at the LEP collider at CERN allowed an experimental lower bound to be set for the mass of the Standard Model Higgs boson of 114.4 GeV/c2 at 95% confidence level. The same experiment has produced a small number of events that could be interpreted as resulting from Higgs bosons with mass just above said cutoff—around 115 GeV—but the number of events was insufficient to draw definite conclusions.[13] The LEP was shut down in 2000 due to construction of its successor, the Large Hadron Collider which is expected to be able to confirm or reject the existence of the Higgs boson. Full operational mode was delayed until mid-November 2009, because of a serious fault discovered with a number of magnets during the calibration and startup phase.[14][15]

At the Fermilab Tevatron, there are ongoing experiments searching for the Higgs boson. As of July 2010, combined data from CDF and DØ experiments at the Tevatron were sufficient to exclude the Higgs boson in the range between 158 GeV/c2 and 175 GeV/c2 at the 95% confidence level.[16] [17] Data collection and analysis in search of Higgs are intensifying since March 30, 2010 when the LHC began operating at 3.5 Tev and is rapidly approaching in its design range of 7 Tev, well above that at which detection should occur.[18]

It may be possible to estimate the mass of the Higgs boson indirectly. In the Standard Model, the Higgs boson has a number of indirect effects; most notably, Higgs loops result in tiny corrections to masses of W and Z bosons. Precision measurements of electroweak parameters, such as the Fermi constant and masses of W/Z bosons, can be used to constrain the mass of the Higgs. As of 2006, measurements of electroweak observables allowed the exclusion of a Standard Model Higgs boson having a mass greater than 285 GeV/c2 at 95% CL, and estimated its mass to be 129+74−49 GeV/c2 (the central value corresponds to approximately 138 proton masses).[19] As of August 2009, the Standard Model Higgs boson is excluded by electroweak measurements above 186 GeV at 95% CL. However, it should be noted that these indirect constraints make the assumption that the Standard Model is correct. One may still discover a Higgs boson above 186 GeV if it is accompanied by other particles between Standard Model and GUT scales.

Some have argued that there already exists potential evidence,[20][21][22] but to date no such evidence has convinced the physics community.

In a 2009 preprint,[23] it has been suggested (and reported under headlines such as Higgs could reveal itself in Dark-Matter collisions[24]) that the Higgs Boson might not only interact with the above-mentioned particles of the Standard model of particle physics, but also with the mysterious WIMPs ("weakly interacting massive particles") of the Dark matter, playing a most-important role in recent astrophysics. In this case, it is natural to augment the above Feynman diagrams by terms representing such an interaction.

In principle, a relation between the Higgs particle and the Dark matter would be "not unexpected", since, (i), the Higgs field does not directly couple to the quanta of light (i.e. the photons), while at the same time, (ii), it generates mass. However, "dark matter" is a metonymy for the discrepancy between the apparent observed mass of the universe and that given by the standard model and is not a component of any known theory of physics so the usefulness of this conjecture is limited.

Barring a discovery during current intensive efforts, it will be at least until sometime after the end of the current physics fill at the LHC in 2011 and some months or years of analysis of the unprecedented data collection effort that a negative finding can be said to have been established.

Alternatives for electroweak symmetry breaking

In the years since the Higgs boson was proposed, several alternatives to the Higgs mechanism have been proposed. All of the alternative mechanisms use strongly interacting dynamics to produce a vacuum expectation value that breaks electroweak symmetry. A partial list of these alternative mechanisms are

"The God particle"

The Higgs boson is often referred to as "the God particle" by the media,[29] after the title of Leon Lederman's book, The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question?.[30] While use of this term may have contributed to increased media interest in particle physics and the Large Hadron Collider,[30] many scientists dislike it.[29] In a renaming competition, a jury of physicists chose the name "the champagne bottle boson" as the best popular name.[31]

See also


Notes

  1. "Huge $10 billion collider resumes hunt for 'God particle' - CNN.com". CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/11/lhc.large.hadron.collider.beam/index.html. Retrieved 2010-05-04. 
  2. "Race for 'God particle' heats up". BBC News. 2009-02-17. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7893689.stm. Retrieved 2010-01-05. 
  3. Englert-Brout-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism on Scholarpedia
  4. Englert, François; Brout, Robert (1964). "Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons". Physical Review Letters 13: 321–23. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321 
  5. Higgs, Peter (1964). "Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons". Physical Review Letters 13: 508–509. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508 
  6. Guralnik, Gerald; Hagen, C. R.; Kibble, T. W. B. (1964). "Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles". Physical Review Letters 13: 585–587. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585 
  7. Guralnik, Gerald S. (2009). "The History of the Guralnik, Hagen and Kibble development of the Theory of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Gauge Particles". International Journal of Modern Physics A24: 2601–2627. doi:10.1142/S0217751X09045431. arXiv:0907.3466 
  8. Physical Review Letters - 50th Anniversary Milestone Papers. Physical Review Letters. http://prl.aps.org/50years/milestones#1964 
  9. "American Physical Society - J. J. Sakurai Prize Winners". http://www.aps.org/units/dpf/awards/sakurai.cfm 
  10. A quasi-political Explanation of the Higgs Boson; for Mr Waldegrave, UK Science Minister 1993
  11. T. Schücker (2007). "Higgs-mass predictions". arΧiv:0708.3344 [hep-ph]. 
  12. Scientists present first “bread-and-butter” results from LHC collisions Symmetry Breaking, 8 June 2010
  13. W.-M. Yao et al. (2006). Searches for Higgs Bosons "Review of Particle Physics". Journal of Physics G 33: 1. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001. http://pdg.lbl.gov/2006/reviews/higgs_s055.pdf Searches for Higgs Bosons. 
  14. "CERN management confirms new LHC restart schedule". CERN Press Office. 9 February 2009. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2009/PR02.09E.html. Retrieved 2009-02-10. 
  15. "CERN reports on progress towards LHC restart". CERN Press Office. 19 June 2009. http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2009/PR09.09E.html. Retrieved 2009-07-21. 
  16. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF and DØ Collaborations) (2010). "Combination of Tevatron searches for the standard model Higgs boson in the W+W decay mode". arΧiv:1001.4162 [hep-ex]. 
  17. "Fermilab experiments narrow allowed mass range for Higgs boson". Fermilab. 26 July 2010. http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/Higgs-mass-constraints-20100726-images.html. Retrieved 2010-07-26. 
  18. CERN Bulletin Issue No. 18-20/2010 - Monday 3 May 2010
  19. "H0 Indirect Mass Limits from Electroweak Analysis."
  20. Potential Higgs Boson discovery: "Higgs Boson: Glimpses of the God particle." New Scientist, 02 March 2007
  21. "'God particle' may have been seen," BBC news, 10 March, 2004.
  22. US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' BBC News 14 June 2010
  23. arXiv:0912.0004 Higgs in Space!
  24. Physics World, [1] , a website supported by the British Institute of Physics
  25. S. Dimopoulos and Leonard Susskind (1979). "Mass Without Scalars". Nuclear Physics B 155: 237–252. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90364-X. 
  26. C. Csaki and C. Grojean and L. Pilo and J. Terning (2004). "Towards a realistic model of Higgsless electroweak symmetry breaking". Physical Review Letters 92: 101802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.101802. arXiv:hep-ph/0308038. 
  27. L. F. Abbott and E. Farhi (1981). "Are the Weak Interactions Strong?". Physics Letters B 101: 69. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90492-5. 
  28. Bilson-Thompson, Sundance O.; Markopoulou, Fotini; Smolin, Lee (2007). "Quantum gravity and the standard model". Class. Quantum Grav. 24 (16): 3975–3993. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/16/002. arXiv:hep-th/0603022. 
  29. 29.0 29.1 Ian Sample (29 May 2009). "Anything but the God particle". London: The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/may/29/why-call-it-the-god-particle-higgs-boson-cern-lhc. Retrieved 2009-06-24. 
  30. 30.0 30.1 Ian Sample (3 March 2009). "Father of the God particle: Portrait of Peter Higgs unveiled". London: The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/mar/02/god-particle-peter-higgs-portrait-lhc. Retrieved 2009-06-24. 
  31. Sample, Ian (2009-06-12). "Higgs competition: Crack open the bubbly, the God particle is dead". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/jun/05/cern-lhc-god-particle-higgs-boson. Retrieved 2010-05-04. 

References

Further reading

  • G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble (1964). "Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles". Physical Review Letters 13: 585. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585. 
  • F. Englert and R. Brout (1964). "Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons". Physical Review Letters 13: 321. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321. 
  • P. Higgs (1964). "Broken Symmetries, Massless Particles and Gauge Fields". Physics Letters 12: 132. doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9. 
  • P. Higgs (1964). "Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons". Physical Review Letters 13: 508. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508. 
  • P. Higgs (1966). "Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons". Physical Review 145: 1156. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.145.1156. 
  • Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio (1961). "Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity". Physical Review 122: 345–358. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.122.345. 
  • J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg (1962). "Broken Symmetries". Physical Review 127: 965. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.127.965. 
  • P.W. Anderson (1963). "Plasmons, Gauge Invariance, and Mass". Physical Review 130: 439. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.439. 
  • A. Klein and B.W. Lee (1964). "Does Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry Imply Zero-Mass Particles?". Physical Review Letters 12: 266. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.266. 
  • W. Gilbert (1964). "Broken Symmetries and Massless Particles". Physical Review Letters 12: 713. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.713. 

External links